Gardasil 9

An application has been made by Seqirus Australia to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee to list Gardasil 9 on the National Immunisation Program as a 2-dose schedule for females and males aged 12-13 years as part of a school age program for the prevention of the human papilloma virus HPV. This listing if approved will replace the current 3-dose schedule of Gardasil, the 4-valent HPV vaccine. The committee whose role it is to recommend new medicines for listing on the PBS is due to meet again in July 2017.

Gardasil 9 which was approved for use in Australia by the TGA last year is said to be protective against nine HPV types: 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58. On the Gardasil 9 page of Merck’s website, the slogan: Your Child Could Be One Less At Risk For Certain HPV-Related Cancers And Diseases is prominently placed beside several happy, sporty children. Below is the directive to caring parents which reads ‘Help Protect Them With The HPV  Vaccine’. However if this vaccine is anything like its predecessor the 4-valent Gardasil, it is likely to be anything but protective. Currently there are tens of thousands of young girls who have become very ill after having their Gardasil shots. Sanevax records the numbers of young people injured and those who have died after HPV vaccinations. These are figures from the United States recording system VAERS and currently the numbers of adverse events are over 50,000 along with 317 deaths. These numbers are mainly from the USA and some parts of Europe and so these totals are far from accurate. Gardasil is authorised for use in 130 countries and 205 million doses have been administered. One would hope that this carnage could not continue and that the HPV vaccinations programs put on hold but instead there is another vaccine in the mix. Far from being protective this new HPV vaccine contains even more aluminium than the current HPV vaccine Gardasil which contains 225 micrograms.  One shot of Gardasil 9 has 500 mcg of this neurotoxin. Girls and boys will receive two shots of this new HPV vaccine bringing the total amount of aluminium injected into young bodies up to 1000mcg.

In FDA approved Gardasil 9: Malfeasance or Stupidity?, Norma Erickson has examined the Gardasil 9 package insert where she found that the rate of serious adverse events in  the trials of Gardasil 9 was 2.3-2.5%. Doesn’t sound bad but it really is because it means that for every 100,000 people who are given Gardasil 9 there will be 2300 serious adverse events and yet the cervical cancer rate in the US is around 7 women per 100,000. Talk about insanity!

And that’s not all she found when she examined the insert package. During the trials 2.4% of the recipients developed an autoimmune disorder which means that 2400 people could now be suffering from new diseases just because they had this new Gardasil injection. There was also bad news for women who became pregnant during the trials in that 14.1% suffered adverse outcomes. Erickson notes that those who were in the 4-valent Gardasil trials suffered similar and even higher rates of adverse outcomes of 17%. In all  313 women either lost their babies to spontaneous abortion or late fetal death or gave birth to children with congenital anomalies.

Will Gardasil 9 be listed on the PBS after July this year? Or will the PBAC whose job it is to recommend medicines for listing disapprove Seqirus’s request as occurred in November 2006 when CSL applied for the listing of  the 4-valent Gardasil? On that occasion the decision not to recommend Gardasil was overturned when Prime Minister John Howard stepped in and promised the public that the vaccine would be approved. In the interests of our children and grandchildren we can hope that Gardasil 9 is not listed on the PBS and if it is we will have to be even more vocal in our opposition to this unnecessary vaccination program that has so far failed to prevent one case of cervical cancer.

 

 

 

Gardasil for babies

 

And the carnage is set to continue. I am extremely distressed to hear that a new clinical trial sponsored by Merck is to look at the effects of the HPV vaccine in infants. Blogger Marcella Piper-Terry says that she has long-feared that Gardasil was to be added to the infant (vaccine) schedule and suggests that it was the plan all along. The Gardasil HPV Vaccine Trial using infants as young as one year of age will look at two of the four strains of HPV contained in the Quadrivalent Gardasil vaccine. Gardasil contains 2 strains of HPV that are said to be associated with cervical cancer. These strains are HPV 16 & 18. The other subtypes, HPV 6 & 11  are not associated with cancer but are said to be associated with recurrent respiratory infections. Piper-Terry points out that babies are at a high risk from respiratory infections and suggests that this predisposition is being used as an excuse to introduce the HPV vaccine to babies.

For those of you who like me are stunned about this next move by the vaccine industry Piper-Terry reminds us that the CDC has a history of vaccinating infants for sexually transmitted diseases. Babies are routinely given the Hepatitis B vaccine on the first day of life. Hepatitis B vaccine was first introduced and given to adults at risk of the disease such those who engaged in promiscuous sex,  IV drug users and hospital workers at risk of blood-borne diseases, along with people who were incarcerated or institutionalized. But the Hepatits B vaccine turned out not to be as popular as Merck the manufacturer would have liked and just as is happening with Gardasil not enough people were willing participants and so the vaccine was made part of the infant schedule. This is very bad health policy.

I remember in the 1990s when Hepatitis B was introduced into my home state of Victoria that part of the government-derived hospital funding was dependent on the vaccination of babies with Hepatitis B. This was and is nothing short of corrupt! How this is not questioned by more parents whose newborn babies are given this genetically engineered vaccine containing formaldehyde, a probable cancer-causing agent, and aluminium, a potent neurotoxin and other chemicals that have no place in anyone’s bloodstream, is beyond me. Regrettably the Hepatitis B vaccine has been on the infant schedule for many years now and to think that babies may be injected and damaged with Gardasil as well is abhorrent. It is criminal to lower the age when HPV vaccines are given for it is a vaccine that is associated with the most reported adverse effects.

Young lives that start out full of promise are at the risk of being severely compromised by injecting these unnecessary genetically engineered vaccines containing gross amounts of harmful substances. Is it any wonder that the level of chronic illness is escalating in the general community? There are many days when I find the sickness industry just too much to bear.

 

 

%d bloggers like this: